tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1110283631152387608.post7623842438651837915..comments2023-09-11T09:46:49.973-06:00Comments on The Brave Lass: Chick-fil-A: Setting the record straight (added info)Kamillahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13983400897547054097noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1110283631152387608.post-8093139980864605272013-06-08T23:34:16.868-06:002013-06-08T23:34:16.868-06:00You're a nut.
So is AnonymousYou're a nut.<br />So is AnonymousAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14028250884962882491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1110283631152387608.post-73971090736783750672013-06-08T23:31:53.386-06:002013-06-08T23:31:53.386-06:00I read your comment about Charles and Andy Stanley...I read your comment about Charles and Andy Stanley. You are obviously still a feminist. You are not a believer who understands the Bible and God's word.<br />CS did not commit adultry and neither did his wife. If they got a divorce, why does he have to leave the ministry as pastor? He was correct that God told him, "You stop preaching when I tell you." If he were guilty of adultry I would never support him or watch him again.<br />I never watch AS. I did not see anything about your quoted comment about gays, but they are not to serve on music ministries, in the pulpit, as a deacon, etc. Why don't you comment on their repentence of being gay when God said in the NT and OT, "The adulterer, homosexual shall not ...<br />You're a false Christian like 75% of the U.S. Woem are not to be leaders in the church and tomorrow at Brooklyn TC CS will be preaching and I will confront hom on thisAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14028250884962882491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1110283631152387608.post-18330457726480494562012-08-05T07:29:44.903-06:002012-08-05T07:29:44.903-06:00Kamilla, I think you are a rare treasure in having...Kamilla, I think you are a rare treasure in having the patience, knowledge, and courage to gently but firmly explain obvious things to confused people. Imagine living in time when we have to use terms like ´man-woman marriage!´ <br />I feel they should be called out on their consistent unquestioned use of the term ´gay community,´ as if for centuries two camps have been living separated by a wall or waring with each other. Rather an uncommon unfortunate psychological condition has been exploited and warped into an identity and ´community´ by dark forces.One thing that really helps make a crack is showing them pre-WWII literature calling for communists to promote and normalise homosexuality as part of as a strategy to weaken and confuse society and destroy Christian faith. <br />Keep it up Kamilla!<br />-a readerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1110283631152387608.post-85382903765986300512012-07-31T16:34:26.024-06:002012-07-31T16:34:26.024-06:00Ceuson,
You can choose to view it as anti-gay fun...Ceuson,<br /><br />You can choose to view it as anti-gay funding, if you like. I doubt I can convince you to view it as I would guess Cathy views it - and as I view it - as the promotion of marriage and family. To contend that the uproar is *only* or even *primarily* about a segment of the population making themselves aware of their purchases invites me to not take you seriously. <br /><br />There is a profound difference between marriages which are sterile by choice or natural circumstances and those physically intimate unions between persons of the same sex. The former are natural and of a fruitful type. The later are *necessarily* sterile. They are also not marriages.<br /><br />On the contrary, natural fruitfulness is a foundation and necessary defense of marriage. Whether some unions are sterile is beside the point - they are still of a fruitful type and are still effective icons.<br /><br />For a discussion about Humanae Vitae, conscience and why your friends may regret their voluntary sterilization, see here:<br /><br />http://catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/se0002.htmlKamillahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13983400897547054097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1110283631152387608.post-87151246193071344672012-07-31T16:19:50.062-06:002012-07-31T16:19:50.062-06:00Kamilla, as I understand it, the problem is not an...Kamilla, as I understand it, the problem is not an "utterance" but at least $2 million in anti-gay funding, including cure-the-gay counseling. The gay community is bringing awareness to their own purchases undermining themselves. I hope this helps understand the furor.<br />And, on the fertile and sterile debate, it's very weak for defending man-woman marriage. My best friend and her husband got voluntary sterilization when they married, and it didn't null their union. My grandfather married my beloved step-grandmother when I was 2, and she was post-menopausal, and no one questioned their union. Many marriages have nothing to do with children. If sterile were an issue, all of these marriages would be at least questioned, if not disapproved of.Ceusonnoreply@blogger.com